28 December 2007, Wits University
Programme Director
Premier of Gauteng Provincial Government, Mr. Mbhazima Shilowa
Fellow MEC’s
Friends from the Business Sector
Head of Department and Staff of the Department
Our Guest Speaker, Professor Mike Sathekge
School Principals
Parents and Learners
Officials of the Department
Representatives of various media groups
Honoured Guests
Ladies and Gentlemen
Finally, today I am presenting the very last aspect of the matric examinations results based on the old style curriculum. As we stand on the eve of rolling out the New Curriculum Statements (NCS), I am indeed thrilled that the struggles we waged under the then banner of the then National Education Coordinating Committee (NECC) as well as the United Democratic Front (UDF) have finally yielded visible dividends that will forever make us proud.
It will be therefore, appropriate to salute all those stalwarts that made a major sacrifice for us to move towards a better education as a nation.
May, I also thank the entire Recovery Plan team, Educators, Unions and support staff for the stunning work done in ensuring that our learners get the necessary support after the three week Industrial Action. We had 21 000 educators and 684 schools participating in our Recovery Plan. From the results, we have seen a remarkable improvement to those schools that were affected by the industrial action.
All those educators that participated in the recovery plan can be assured that we have already started with the processing of their payments. I am assured that come end January these payments will be in their bank accounts.
I am also grateful to the team that organised various District Education Summits; it is clear from the results that these summits indeed provided assistance to our schools especially in the Vaal and Soweto nodal areas.
Kindly allow me to present to you a detailed report of the performance of OUR 2007 Matric learners.
Provincial Pass Rate
Table 1.1: 2007 Summary Results Statistics for Fulltime Candidates |
|||||||||
1 |
17307 |
20.41 |
Entered SS/M -Passed SS/M |
||||||
2 |
7145 |
8.43 |
Entered SS/M -Passed SS |
|
|
|
|
||
3 |
6286 |
7.41 |
Entered SS/M - Passed SS with Conditional Exemption |
|
|||||
4 |
32549 |
38.38 |
Entered SS - Passed SS |
|
|
|
|
||
5 |
17078 |
20.14 |
Entered SS - Failed SS |
|
|
|
|
||
6 |
4390 |
5.18 |
Entered SS/M - Failed SS/M & SS |
|
|
|
|||
7 |
47 |
0.06 |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84802 |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass rate |
74.6 |
|
25.4 |
Failed |
100.0 |
|
|
|
Further to this, Table 1.2 above indicates the following pointers:
Table 1.3: Pass rates (2002-2007)
| YEAR | PASS RATE (%) |
DIFFERENCE |
2002 |
78.07 |
4.37 |
2003 |
81.45 |
3.38 |
2004 |
76.70 |
- 4.75 |
2005 |
74.9 |
-1.82 |
2006 |
78.35 |
+4.74 |
2007 |
74.6 |
-3.7 |
The average pass rate achieved over the last six years was 77.35%. Although the 2007 provincial pass rate showed a decline of 3.7% over the 2006 one, it was evident that there was a systemic adjustment at the top end of the results spectrum which, in turn, actually indicates that rigorous standards in assessment and examinations processes have been maintained. This could imply that the normal distribution pattern was intrinsically reestablishing itself over the last six years. Therefore, the targeted provincial pass rate in the 2008 academic year could realistically be set around 75%.
Table 1.4: Analysis of District Results
| District | Pass rate by District for 2007 (%) |
1 (GAUTENG NORTH) |
73.17 |
2 (GAUTENG WEST) |
78.91 |
3 (TSHWANE NORTH) |
70.75 |
4 (TSHWANE SOUTH) |
86.53 |
5 (GAUTENG EAST) |
70.09 |
6 (EKURHULENI NORTH) |
78.82 |
7 (SEDIBENG EAST) |
86.83 |
8 (SEDIBENG WEST) |
58.08 |
9 (JOHANNESBURG EAST) |
84.74 |
10 (JOHANNESBURG NORTH) |
75.52 |
11 (JOHANNESBURG SOUTH) |
71.22 |
12 (JOHANNESBURG WEST) |
81.19 |
14 (JOHANNESBURG CENTRAL) |
71.67 |
15 (TSHWANE WEST) |
73.18 |
16 (EKURHULENI SOUTH) |
65.52 |
Average Pass Rate (%) |
74.63 |
The following observations could be gleaned from the analysis of district results as shown in Table 1.4:
Figure 1.7 Analysis of schools per quintile grouping
The analysis of results in terms of quintiles is as follows:
DISTINCTIONS
Table 1.8: Distinctions (2006-2007)
|
Male 2006 |
Female2006 |
Total |
Male2007 |
Female2007 |
Total 2007 |
Variance |
Candidates who obtained 10 ‘A’ symbols |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
-2 |
Candidates who obtained 9 ‘A’ symbols |
5 |
7 |
12 |
3 |
9 |
12 |
0 |
Candidates who obtained 8 ‘A’ symbols |
30 |
37 |
67 |
13 |
23 |
36 |
-31 |
Candidates who obtained 7 ‘A’ symbols |
71 |
109 |
180 |
76 |
100 |
176 |
-4 |
Candidates who obtained 6 ‘A’ symbols |
110 |
222 |
332 |
99 |
183 |
282 |
-50 |
Candidates who obtained 5 ‘A’ symbols |
147 |
242 |
389 |
107 |
247 |
354 |
-35 |
Candidates who obtained 4 ‘A’ symbols |
195 |
398 |
593 |
200 |
424 |
624 |
31 |
Candidates who obtained 3 ‘A’ symbols |
362 |
649 |
1011 |
351 |
714 |
1065 |
54 |
Candidates who obtained 2 ‘A’ symbols |
807 |
1254 |
2061 |
760 |
1393 |
2153 |
92 |
Candidates who obtained 1 ‘A’ symbol |
2694 |
3515 |
6209 |
2938 |
4161 |
7099 |
890 |
Total |
4424 |
6433 |
10857 |
4548 |
7254 |
11802 |
945 |
Best Performing Public Schools
Top 10 Public Schools
Ranking |
School/Centre |
Learner Enrolment |
Total Endorsements/Enrolled |
Passed endorsement |
Indicator |
1 |
Hoerskool Menlopark |
230 |
188 |
182 |
96.81 |
2 |
Hoerskool Overkrain |
201 |
136 |
130 |
95.59 |
3 |
Benoni High School |
293 |
208 |
198 |
95.19 |
4 |
Afrikaans Hoer Seunskool Pretoria |
225 |
201 |
191 |
95.02 |
5 |
Pretoria High School for Girls |
268 |
253 |
240 |
94.86 |
6 |
Hoerskool Garsfontein |
295 |
219 |
207 |
94.5 |
7 |
Sutherland High School |
223 |
152 |
140 |
92.11 |
8 |
Hoerskool Waterkloof |
425 |
346 |
316 |
91.33 |
9 |
Hoerskool Centurion |
227 |
154 |
140 |
90.91 |
10 |
Greenside High School |
202 |
161 |
142 |
88.2 |
The Best Performing schools that are listed above were arrived at according to school with a learner enrolment of 200 and above, obtained 100% pass rate, and the proportion of learners passed with endorsement.
Worst Performing Schools
Table 1.18: worst performing Schools
| District number | Centre name |
Total Entered |
Total Wrote |
Total Passed |
Total % Passed |
8 |
ED MASHABANE SECONDARY SCHOOL |
115 |
110 |
22 |
20.00 |
11 |
ASTRA COLLEGE |
60 |
40 |
8 |
20.00 |
10 |
NEW NATION SCHOOL |
55 |
46 |
9 |
19.57 |
6 |
GLOBAL SEC COLLEGE |
45 |
40 |
7 |
17.50 |
16 |
KATLEHONG SECONDARY SCHOOL |
464 |
394 |
66 |
16.75 |
11 |
THE AFRICA HOUSE COLLEGE |
30 |
25 |
4 |
16.00 |
8 |
RAMOLELLE INTERMEDIATE |
39 |
39 |
6 |
15.38 |
11 |
BEKEZELA COLLEGE |
13 |
7 |
1 |
14.29 |
11 |
ROBIN HOOD PRIVATE SECONDARY SCHOOL |
25 |
21 |
3 |
14.29 |
6 |
MEHLARENG COMBINED FARM SCHOOL |
25 |
24 |
3 |
12.50 |
For the purpose of this report the following schools mentioned were the worst in terms of having obtained pass rates of 20% and below:
The distinguishing features of these schools were as follows
Gateway Subjects
National Subjects
Schools of focused learning
School of focussed learning are those schools that offer specialised programmes, including sport (Rosina Sedibane Modiba), arts (National School of the Arts, Science (St Barnabas Secondary School), and Commerce (Pace Secondary School).
Overall learner enrolment in the schools of focussed learning increased from 219 in 2006 to 268 in 2007 which represents a 2% growth
Table 1.16 Schools of focussed Learning
| 2006 Centre name | 2006 Total Entered |
2006 Total Wrote |
2006 Total Passed |
2006 Total % Passed |
2007 Total Entered |
2007 Total Wrote |
2007 Total Passed |
2007 Total % Passed |
Difference 2007 & 2006 |
ROSINA SEDIBANE MODIBA SPORT SCHOOL |
55 |
55 |
46 |
83.64 |
51 |
51 |
40 |
78.43 |
-5.20 |
ST BARNABAS COLLEGE |
52 |
51 |
49 |
96.08 |
76 |
75 |
64 |
85.33 |
-10.75 |
PACE SECONDARY PRIVATE SCHOOL |
20 |
20 |
20 |
100.00 |
47 |
47 |
38 |
80.85 |
-19.15 |
National School of the Arts |
92 |
89 |
86 |
96.63 |
94 |
90 |
89 |
98.89 |
2.26 |
NATIONAL SUBJECTS
Biology HG
Biology SG
Business Economics HG
Business Economics SG
Economics HG
Economics SG
Learner enrolment for national subjects
GATEWAY SUBJECTS
The following observations were made in regard to gateway subjects:
English HG and SG
Mathematics HG and SG
Physical science HG and SG
Accounting HG and SG
Accounting HG and SG
English Second Language HG and SG
Mathematics HG and SG
Physical science HG and SG
DINALEDI
The focus of the Dinaledi Schools Initiative is to ensure the improvement in Maths HG passes, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The following observations were made in terms of their performance in 2007:
WAY FORWARD
Conclusion
Although the occasion of a decline in the provincial pass rate is a source of major concern, the overall picture does not present gloomy future prospects. The underlying systemic fundamentals to fuel improvements in learner performance are in place. The challenge is to look to address the pitfalls of the past and prepare for the future.
The imperative to improve the quality of education rests on how well learners are taught and how much they learn. It is also crucial to direct our efforts at the socioeconomic factors, resource allocation and equity. By focusing on these dimensions, the attainment of educational outcomes could be enhanced.
The 2008 academic year will for the first time see learners write the new National Senior Certificate examinations. This will set the tone for the performance of learners going forward.
VOTE OF THANKS
My sincere gratitude goes to the Premier of Gauteng, Mr Mbhazima Shilowa for his continued support as well as my fellow MEC’s in the Executive, the HOD, Mr Mallele Petje, the entire Examination Unit Staff, My Office as well as my family for their understanding.
I thank you and wish all learners leaving schooling the best in their future endeavours, those afforded the second chance to take the opportunity and the rest of you compliments for 2008.
I thank you!